OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

Citizen Center v. Gessler

Case Information

Date Filed: February 13, 2012
State: Colorado
Issues: Improper Election Administration, Voting Technology
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Case 1:12-cv-00370); United States 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 12-1414)

Issue:

Whether the election procedures of six Colorado counties infringe on the rights to vote, political expression, and speech.

Status:

complaint filed 2/13/12. Motions to Dismiss filed 6/4/12. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed 8/17/12. Case dismissed by minute order 9/24/12. Judgment issued 9/25/12. Appeal docketed with 10th Circuit on 10/30/12. Oral Arguments held 3/17/14. Opinion reversing in part, affirming in part filed 10/21/14. Petition for Rehearing En Banc filed 11/4/14. Order denying Petition for Rehearing En Banc filed 11/17/14. Petition for writ of certiorari filed 2/20/15. Notice of denial of certiorari filed 4/27/15. District Court order dismissing case filed 08/19/15.

See related state court case: Marks v. Koch

Circuit Court Documents

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

A Special Master for the Cohen Case?

Edward B. Foley

There should be a strong presumption against special treatment just because the president is involved. 

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

Columbus City Council Will See Some Reforms, But Not For Another Six Years

Professor Edward Foley was quoted in WOSU about changes to Columbus City Council that will stem from the passage of Issue 3.

 

“In a city where one political party is dominant, it makes sense to think about the citizen's commission to take it out of the hands of the politicians,” Foley said. “Because if you leave it in the hands of the politicians, it’s hard to get balance between the two parties.”


more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court Decides Wisconsin and Maryland Gerrymandering Cases on Procedural Grounds

In opinions issued today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two gerrymandering cases on procedural grounds. In an opinion in the Wisconsin case of Gill v. Whitford, the Court found that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the legislature\'s redistricting plan. In an opinion in the Maryland case of Benisek v. Lamone, the Court determined that the District Court was within its discretion in denying preliminary relief to the plaintiffs challenging the legislature\'s redistricting plan.

more info & analysis...