Last Updated: February 24, 2012 at 11:17 AM
Citizen Center v. Gessler
Date Filed: February 13, 2012
Issues: Improper Election Administration, Voting Technology
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Case 1:12-cv-00370)
Whether Mesa County, Colorado's election procedures infringe on the rights to vote, political expression, and speech.
complaint filed 2/13/12.
District Court Documents
- Complaint (filed 2/13/12)
Edward B. Foley
One to watch very closely.
In the News
Professor David Stebenne was quoted in an Ohio Watchdog article about the possibility of Governor John Kasich winning all 88 Ohio counties in his re-election bid.
“It’s really hard to do,” he said. “As popular as the governor is and as weak as his opponent is, I doubt he’ll carry all 88 (counties).”
Stebenne said Ohio has some unusual counties, which tend to be really Democratic or really Republican.
He said a good example was the election of 1956, when President Dwight Eisenhower carried 87 of 88 Ohio counties.
“He lost one of the Appalachian counties — a poor county where the residents tend to vote Democratic no matter what,” Stebenne said. “There was even some humorous discussion in the Oval Office about that one county.”
Glenn and Voinovich were “the two most popular candidates in modern history,” he added, “and they each only did it once. While Kasich is popular, he really doesn’t have the broad appeal that these two did.”
Stebenne said that both Voinovich and Kasich come from communities that tend to be more Democratic in voter registration, but that Kasich’s first race for governor was more divisive than the races for Voinovich.
“Voinovich had electoral success in Cleveland and as governor because he was able to persuade Democrats to vote Republican,” he said. “Glenn had national appeal across party lines.”
Info & Analysis
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upholds State's Use of Electronic Voting Machines
In an opinion released earlier this week, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed a Commonwealth Court decision finding that the state's use of direct electronic voting machines (DREs) did not violate Pennsylvania statutory or constitutional law. The case is Banfield v. Cortes.
- ACLU v. Schultz
- Alabama Democratic Conference v. Alabama
- Arcia v. Detzner
- Arizona Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
- Banfield v. Cortes
- Barber et al. v. Bennett
- Citizen Center v. Gessler
- Currie v. North Carolina
- Davis v. Perry
- Fair Elections Ohio, The Amos Project, et al v. Husted
- Frank v. Walker
- Harris v. Brown
- Kobach v. EAC
- League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. Howard
- Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted
- LULAC v. Deininger
- NAACP v. Husted
- NEOCH v. Husted
- North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory
- Perez v. Texas
- Scott v. Schedler
- SEIU v. Husted
- Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder
- Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
- Texas v. United States
- True the Vote, Inc. v. IRS
- United States v. North Carolina
- United States v. Texas
- Veasey v. Perry
- Voting for America v. Skeen
- Wagner v. Federal Election Commission
- Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar