Last Updated: February 24, 2012 at 11:17 AM
Citizen Center v. Gessler
Date Filed: February 13, 2012
Issues: Improper Election Administration, Voting Technology
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Case 1:12-cv-00370)
Whether Mesa County, Colorado's election procedures infringe on the rights to vote, political expression, and speech.
complaint filed 2/13/12.
District Court Documents
- Complaint (filed 2/13/12)
In the News
Professor Edward Foley was requoted in Mother Jones about a gerrymandering case in Wisconsin on its way to the Supreme Court. Other legal actions on partisan gerrymandering in Maryland and in North Carolina may be bound for the Supreme Court as well.
While previous Supreme Court cases have noted that partisan gerrymanders are “incompatible with democratic principles,” The New York Times originally reported, the court has never officially struck a case down. While it remains unseen how the Supreme Court will rule in the upcoming cases, a 2004 ruling from a previous gerrymandering case could play a pivotal role in how the court stands in the future.
“The ordered working of our Republic, and of the democratic process, depends on a sense of decorum and restraint in all branches of government, and in the citizenry itself,” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote in 2004. Kennedy’s statement is “the most important line” in the decision, Foley told The New York Times, adding, “He’s going to look at what’s going on in North Carolina as the complete absence of that. I think that helps the plaintiffs in any of these cases.”
Info & Analysis
Three-Judge Panel Finds Voting Rights Act and Constitutional Violations in Creation of Texas House of Representatives Districts
A little over a month after ruling that Texas\' Congressional redistricting plan violated the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Consistution, a three-judge panel similarly ruled (2-1) with regard to the creation of Texas\' state-level House of Representatives districts. The court issued a 171-page order in which it ruled for the state on some claims. The court also made separate findings of fact. The case is Perez v. Abbott.
- Alabama Democratic Conference v. Alabama
- Benisek v. Lamone
- Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections
- Common Cause v. Kemp
- Common Cause v. Rucho
- Feldman v. Arizona
- Fish v. Kobach
- Florida Democratic Party v. Detzner
- Frank v. Walker
- Georgia NAACP v. Georgia
- Hindel v. Husted
- League of Women Voters v. Newby
- NEOCH v. Husted
- North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections
- North Carolina v. North Carolina NAACP
- Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute and NEOCH v. Husted
- One Wisconsin Institute v. Thomsen
- Perez v. Abbott
- Stein v. Cortes
- True the Vote, Inc. v. IRS
- Veasey v. Abbott
- Whitford v. Nichol