Last Updated: February 24, 2012 at 11:17 AM
Citizen Center v. Gessler
Date Filed: February 13, 2012
Issues: Improper Election Administration, Voting Technology
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (Case 1:12-cv-00370)
Whether Mesa County, Colorado's election procedures infringe on the rights to vote, political expression, and speech.
complaint filed 2/13/12.
District Court Documents
- Complaint (filed 2/13/12)
In the News
Professor Edward Foley was quoted in Voice of America about President Donald Trump’s plans to launch a “major investigation” into voter fraud. Trump claims he lost the popular vote because as many as 5 million non-U.S. citizens may have voted illegally.
“As I understand the latest allegations, somewhere between 3 to 5 million improper ballots were cast this past November nationwide, which Trump claims accounts for why Hillary Clinton won the popular vote,” Foley said. “Even if there were 3 to 5 million invalid votes nationwide, we can’t jump to the conclusion that the election result was tainted, because we don’t know who they voted for.”
The odds of a non-U.S. citizen successfully casting a ballot are “extremely low, extraordinarily low,” according to Foley. Instances in which invalid ballots are cast or when voters’ names appear on multiple state voter rolls also don’t necessarily indicate voter fraud either, he added.
“Just because a ballot was cast that was invalid, which is a problem, doesn’t necessarily mean there was a conspiracy to commit voter fraud,” Foley said. “Fraud is a pejorative term that implies intentional deception and manipulation, as opposed to there being mistakes in voter registration lists.”
Info & Analysis
U.S. District Judge Rules that Ohio Voter Services Website Violates ADA
A U.S. District Judge issued an opinion finding that the Ohio Secretary of State\'s voter services website violates Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act because it is not accessible to visually impaired Ohio voters. Judge George C. Smith ordered Secretary of State John Husted to make the site more accessible by September 29, 2017. As discussed in the opinion, the information on the voter services site does not meet established standards of accessibility for visually impaired voters who use screen reading software. The case is Hindel v. Husted.
- Alabama Democratic Conference v. Alabama
- Benisek v. Lamone
- Common Cause v. Kemp
- Common Cause v. Rucho
- Feldman v. Arizona
- Fish v. Kobach
- Florida Democratic Party v. Detzner
- Frank v. Walker
- Hindel v. Husted
- League of Women Voters v. Newby
- NEOCH v. Husted
- North Carolina NAACP v. North Carolina
- North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections
- Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute and NEOCH v. Husted
- One Wisconsin Institute v. Thomsen
- Perez v. Texas
- Stein v. Cortes
- True the Vote, Inc. v. IRS
- Veasey v. Abbott
- Whitford v. Nichol