1. Help
2. Campus map
3. Find people
4. Webmail
5. Search Ohio State

• About
  EL@M
  • About Us
  • Experts by Topic
• Faculty
  • Edward B. "Ned" Foley
  • Daniel P. Tokaji
  • Terri L. Enns
  • Steven F. Huefner
  • Donald B. Tobin
  • EL@M Fellows
  • EL@M Staff
  • Experts by Topic
• Election Law
  Litigation
  • Major Pending Cases
  • Archived Cases
• Current
  Features
  • 2008 Primary Post-Election Timeline
  • Voting Machine Issues Nationwide (2008)
  • From Registration to Recounts (Book)
  • Voter ID Litigation Nationwide
  • Major Election Law Reports
  • Equal Vote
  • Free & Fair
  • Weekly Teleconference
  • Featured Comments
• Archived
  Features
  • 50 Questions for 5 Key States
  • 2006 Election Overview
  • 2006 Recount Roundup
  • 2006 Ohio Primary Problems
  • 2006 Voting Technology Nationwide
  • 2006 Election Podcasts
  • Electronic Roundtable '06
  • Ohio Voter Registration Regulations
  • e-Book
  • Past Case Decisions
  • 2005 Redistricting Developments
• Biweekly
  Update
  • Subscribe
• Related
  Links
• Media
  Information
• A Joint Project with the
  Moritz Law Library

Callen v. Blackwell

(page last updated July 18, 2008 at 9:21 AM)

Case Information

Current Court: Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Ohio (Case 06 CV 014411)
All Courts: Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Ohio (Case 06 CV 014411)
Topic(s): Voting Technology

Warning: mysql_fetch_assoc(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /usr/local/webs/moritzlaw/htdocs/electionlaw/includes/mpc_caseinfo.php on line 81
State:
Date Filed: November 14, 2006

Issue: Whether Ohio's use of Diebold and ES&S voting machines violate state law requirements for reliability, security, accuracy, verifiability, and accessibility.

Status: Complaint filed 11/14/06; Motion to Dismiss filed 11/22/06; Answer filed 12/4/06. Motion to amend complaint granted 4/9/08. Continuance granted until 2/9/09 on 5/8/08.

Related EL@M Stories

• New Suit Attacks Ohio Voting Machines

Trial Court Documents

• Docket
• Complaint (filed 11/14/06)
• Case schedule (filed 11/14/06)
• Motion to Dismiss with Motion in Support (filed 11/22/06)
• Answer Of Defendant Miami County Board Of Elections (filed 12/4/06)
• Response to Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (filed 1/12/07)
• Reply Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss (filed 1/18/07)
• Decision Entry Granting Non-Resident Counties' Motions to Dismiss (entered 1/26/07)
• Answer to Complaint (filed 2/21/07)
• Cuyahoga Election Review Panel Final Report 7/20/06 (filed 4/4/07)
• Strike Schedule Date (scheduled for 1/2/08) (entered 10/25/07)
• Continuance granted until 1/10/08 (entered 10/25/07)
• AMENDED COMPLAINT(4/9/08)
• GRANTING MTN TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO CONFORM CAPTION & CONTENT TO THE RULINGS, DISMISSALS & FACTS & STIPULATION IN SUPPORT (4/9/08)
• MOTION TO DISMISS (filed 4/18/08)
• CONSENT TO MOVE OR PLEAD (filed 4/25/08)
• ORDER WITHDRAWING MTN TO DISMISS AND VACATE TRIAL DATE (entered 5/8/08)
• CONTINUANCE  granted until 2/9/09 (entered 5/8/08)

Election Law @ Moritz | Professor Edward B. Foley, Director | electionlaw@osu.edu
Please note: Election Law @ Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law @ Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law @ Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation, but individuals affiliated with the program may from time to time in their own personal capacity engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.

The Ohio State University | Michael E. Moritz College of Law | 55 West 12th Avenue | Columbus, OH 43210-1391 | (614) 292-2631