Last Updated: September 10, 2010 at 1:40 PM
Callen v. Blackwell
Case Information
Date Filed / Ended: November 14, 2006 / January 12, 2009
State: Ohio
Issue: Voting Technology
Courts that Heard this Case: Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County, Ohio (Case 06 CV 014411)
Issue:
Whether Ohio's use of Diebold and ES&S voting machines violate state law requirements for reliability, security, accuracy, verifiability, and accessibility.
Status:
Complaint filed 11/14/06; Motion to Dismiss filed 11/22/06; Answer filed 12/4/06. Motion to amend complaint granted 4/9/08. Continuance granted until 2/9/09 on 5/8/08. Dismissal by Plaintiff filed 1/12/09. Termination of Case entered 1/12/09. Strike Schedule Date (2/9/09) entered on 1/12/09.
Trial Court Documents
- Docket
- Complaint
(filed 11/14/06) - Case schedule
(filed 11/14/06) - Motion to Dismiss with Motion in Support
(filed 11/22/06) - Answer Of Defendant Miami County Board Of Elections
(filed 12/4/06) - Response to Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint
(filed 1/12/07) - Reply Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss
(filed 1/18/07) - Decision Entry Granting Non-Resident Counties' Motions to Dismiss
(entered 1/26/07) - Answer to Complaint
(filed 2/21/07) - Cuyahoga Election Review Panel Final Report 7/20/06
(filed 4/4/07) - Strike Schedule Date (scheduled for 1/2/08) (entered 10/25/07)
- Continuance granted until 1/10/08 (entered 10/25/07)
- AMENDED COMPLAINT(4/9/08)
- GRANTING MTN TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO CONFORM CAPTION & CONTENT TO THE RULINGS, DISMISSALS & FACTS & STIPULATION IN SUPPORT (4/9/08)
- MOTION TO DISMISS (filed 4/18/08)
- CONSENT TO MOVE OR PLEAD (filed 4/25/08)
- ORDER WITHDRAWING MTN TO DISMISS AND VACATE TRIAL DATE (entered 5/8/08)
- CONTINUANCE granted until 2/9/09 (entered 5/8/08)
- ORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICES FILED (filed 5/9/08)
- DISMISSAL by PLAINTIFF (filed 1/12/09)
- TERMINATE CASE (entered 1/12/09)
- Strike Schedule Date (scheduled for 2/9/09) (entered 1/12/09)




Commentary
A Poster Child for Dysfunctional Districting
Daniel P. Tokaji
Fifty years ago next month, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Baker v. Carr (1962), inaugurating the “reapportionment revolution” which led to the redrawing of legislative districts across the country. This milestone provides the opportunity to reflect not only on what has been accomplished, but also on what still needs to be done.
more commentary...