OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Litigation

 

CREW v. IRS

Case Information

Date Filed: May 21, 2013
State: Washington, D.C.
Issue: Campaign Finance
Courts that Heard this Case: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Case 1:13-cv-00732)

Issue:

1. Did the IRS act arbitrarily, capriciously, and contrary to law in denying plaintiff's petition for rulemaking to address asserted conflict between regulations governing 501(c)(4) organizations and the Tax Code?

2. Is plaintiff entitled to a writ of mandamus compelling the IRS to institute rulemaking proceedings and address asserted inconsistency between regulations governing 501(c)(4) organizations and the Tax Code?

Status:

Complaint filed 5/21/13. U.S.'s Motion to Dismiss filed 8/30/13. Order Consolidating Case with Van Hollen v. IRS filed 9/6/13. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed 10/25/13. Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by Van Hollen, Democracy 21, Campaign Legal Center, and Public Citizen, Inc. filed 12/6/13. Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed 2/27/14.

District Court Documents

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Flagging Online Falsehoods

Edward B. Foley

A remedy for foreign disinformation attacks

more commentary...

In the News

Edward B. Foley

How states can fix the Electoral College and prevent future Trumps

An op-ed written by Professor Edward Foley about repairing the Electoral College was published in USA Today.

“The imperative is to prevent another president who wins the White House without really winning the support of the electorates in the states that determine the outcome,” Foley writes. “The Founding Fathers would see that as a subversion of the Electoral College system. So should we.”
 

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Sixth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Ohio ADA Case Alleging Discrimination Against Blind Voters

In an opinion released today, a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the district court dismissing a lawsuit alleging that Ohio\'s absentee voter system discriminates against blind voters. According to the panel, the district court accepted Ohio Secretary of State John Husted\'s \"fundamental alteration\" defense without any evidentiary support. The case, Hindel v. Husted, was remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

more info & analysis...