OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Free & Fair

"By the way, we have to fix that"

Correction: the President was originally quoted as saying "we need to fix that"; the quote has been changed to be exactly accurate.

At the beginning of his reelection victory speech, President Obama referred to the extraordinarily -- and unacceptably -- long lines that many voters in this year's election faced.  Then, he added: "By the way, we have to fix that." 

Let us hope that there is bipartisan support for that sentiment. 

There will be ample time for reflection and examination on what went wrong this year regarding the voting process, and what aspects of it work properly.  But for now it is enough to say that there is an overwhelming, and widespread, impression that "surely we can do better" -- to echo Alex Keyssar's eloquent statement today on the New York Times website.  As he said, it is a serious problem that "[a]ll of us now expect elections to be not only competition between candidates and parties but also conflicts over voting rights and election procedures." 

Rick Hasen has expressed the hope that the nation won't ignore the significant structural weaknesses in our electoral system, now that the presidential election is "over" (except, of course, for all the official processes that remain, from the canvassing of returns to the meeting of the Electoral College, and the congressional reception of those Electoral Votes).  I share Rick's hope, and look forward to doing the hard work necessary -- through the American Law Institute's election law project and otherwise -- to help develop principles and proposals for what an improved electoral system would entail. 

Meanwhile, there remain races other than the presidency that are still "too close to call," and it will be important over the next days and potentially weeks to watch the processes by which they are officially determined.

 

Edward B. Foley is Director of the Election Law @ Moritz program. His primary area of current research concerns the resolution of disputed elections. Having published several law journal articles on this topic, he is currently writing a book on the history of disputed elections in the United States. He is also serving as Reporter for the American Law Institute's new Election Law project. Professor Foley's "Free & Fair" is a collection of his writings that he has penned for Election Law @ Moritz. View Complete Profile

Commentary

Donald B. Tobin

FAQ on social welfare organizations

Donald B. Tobin

The Frank E. and Virginia H. Bazler Designated Professor in Business Law and a senior fellow at Election Law @ Moritz explains the nuances of social welfare organizations and federal regulations related to them.

more commentary...

In the News

Donald B. Tobin

How Did The IRS Get The Job Of Vetting Political Activity?

Professor Donald Tobin was interviewed by the Boston NPR station on its show Here & Now about the Internal Revenue Service's investigation into groups classified as social welfare organizations (marked by the 501(c)(4) tax classification). The IRS was in search of groups that are not focusing primarly on the social welfare of the country, but have a strong political advocacy facet. Political advocacy groups might want to be classified as 501(c)(4) organizations because under that classification they do not have to disclose their donors.

"The key is if you going to be engaged in candidate-type advocacy, and if you're going to intervene in elections and engage in election advocacy, we want disclosure of who your donors are," Tobin said.

“What groups are trying to do here is avoid having to disclose,” Tobin continued. “By earning the classification of social welfare, they’re avoiding the campaign disclosure that’s required for political organizations. So that’s really the underpinning of why we have this mess of the IRS having to get in and investigate and figure out whether an organization is political or not.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Ohio House Committee Recommends Upholding Landis' Election Victory

Yesterday, an Ohio House of Representatives committee recommended 5-4 that the Ohio House uphold the election victory of Republican State Representative Al Landis over Democratic challenger Josh O'Farrell. In February, the Ohio Supreme Court sent the O'Farrell v. Landis record to the House for consideration. According to an article in the Canton Repository, committee chairman and State Representative Matt Huffman said he expects a vote by the full House later this month.

more info & analysis...