1. Help
2. Campus map
3. Find people
4. Webmail
5. Search Ohio State

• About
  EL@M
  • About Us
  • Experts by Topic
• Faculty
  • Edward B. "Ned" Foley
  • Daniel P. Tokaji
  • Terri L. Enns
  • Steven F. Huefner
  • Donald B. Tobin
  • EL@M Fellows
  • EL@M Staff
  • Experts by Topic
• Election Law
  Litigation
  • Major Pending Cases
  • Archived Cases
• Current
  Features
  • 2008 Primary Post-Election Timeline
  • Voting Machine Issues Nationwide (2008)
  • From Registration to Recounts (Book)
  • Voter ID Litigation Nationwide
  • Major Election Law Reports
  • Equal Vote
  • Free & Fair
  • Weekly Teleconference
  • Featured Comments
• Archived
  Features
  • 50 Questions for 5 Key States
  • 2006 Election Overview
  • 2006 Recount Roundup
  • 2006 Ohio Primary Problems
  • 2006 Voting Technology Nationwide
  • 2006 Election Podcasts
  • Electronic Roundtable '06
  • Ohio Voter Registration Regulations
  • e-Book
  • Past Case Decisions
  • 2005 Redistricting Developments
• Biweekly
  Update
  • Subscribe
• Related
  Links
• Media
  Information
• A Joint Project with the
  Moritz Law Library

Archives

Edward B. Foley is one of the nation's preeminent experts on election law. As Director of the Election Law @ Moritz program he is well versed in all aspects of election law.

His primary areas of expertise include campaign finance especially regarding the role of 527 organizations and provisional voting. Foley is also an authority on laws concerning contested elections and ballot recounts as well as the rules that govern polling place observers. Other areas of his expertise include ballot access for independent candidates, laws against voter intimidation, and get out the vote efforts.

Professor Foley's "Free & Fair" is a collection of his writings that he has penned for Election Law @ Moritz.

2008

• Crawford and the Amicus Court: Further Support for a Non-Partisan Advisory Tribunal (4/29/08)
• Setting an Example of Non-Partisan Judging: An "Amicus Court" for Election Cases (4/28/08)
• Federal Court Extension of Polling Hours: Problem, Proposal, Example (Part 3) (4/15/08)
• Federal Court Extension of Polling Hours: Problem, Proposal, Example (Part 2) (4/1/08)
• Federal Court Extension of Polling Hours: Problem, Proposal, Example (3/18/08)
• Unjustified Federal Court Extension of Polling Hours (3/5/08)
• Cross-over voting under Ohio law (3/4/08)
• "Central Counting" of Paper Ballots in Ohio (2/25/08)
• Administering the March 4 Primary in Ohio (2/19/08)
• Super Tuesday and Provisional Ballots (2/6/08)
• Oral Argument in Voter ID Case: Initial Impressions (1/9/08)

2007

• Look to Minnesota for vote-counting solution (12/19/07)
• Refining the Bush v. Gore Taxonomy (11/2/07)
• The Supreme Court and Election Law: In Search of Doctrinal Specificity (10/2/07)
• Precedent and Judicial Responsibility (7/3/07)
• A Model Court for Contested Elections (Or, the “Field of Dreams” Approach to Election Law Reform) (6/19/07)
• Auditing a State’s Laws for Resolving Election Contests (5/8/07)
• Running Elections in Cuyahoga County Next Year (4/10/07)
• The Future of Bush v. Gore (4/5/07)
• A Bipartisan Way to Settle a Disputed Presidential Election in Ohio? (2/14/07)
• The Nation's Interest in Ohio's New Secretary of State (2/13/07)
• Designing the Democracy Index (1/16/07)

2006

• Election Reform's Top Priority: Changing the Electoral College Calendar (12/19/06)
• Happy Birthday, Bush v. Gore (12/12/06)
• Timing is Everything (12/5/06)
• OH-15: Legal Issues in Recount (11/28/06)
• Redistricting Reform: Back on the Agenda (11/22/06)
• OH-15: 500 Provisional Ballots Invalidated (11/22/06)
• Local Blackouts on the Electoral Grid (11/14/06)
• Montana: Recount and Contest Laws (11/8/06)
• Ohio: Wednesday Morning, 3:00am (11/8/06)
• Be Thankful If It’s All Over By Thanksgiving (11/7/06)
• The Adversarial Legal System at Work (11/6/06)
• Transparency Promotes Trust (11/5/06)
• Serious Issues Surface in Maryland (11/2/06)
• Appellate Opinion in ID Case: No Pre-Voting Remedy Needed (10/31/06)
• Ohio's ID Rules in the Appeals Court: What Next? (10/28/06)
• Two Details of TRO in Ohio ID Case (10/27/06)
• TRO in Ohio Voter ID Case: Initial Thoughts (10/27/06)
• ID Disparities & Post-Voting Review of Provisional or Absentee Ballots (10/25/06)
• Late Delivery of Registration Forms (10/23/06)
• Absentee Ballots in Close Elections: Will They Provide Grounds for a Contest? (10/23/06)
• Purcell v. Gonzales: Implications (10/20/06)
• Supreme Court ID Opinion: Preliminary Analysis (10/20/06)
• ID Equities? (10/16/06)
• The Arizona Voter ID case in the Supreme Court: What's Next? (10/16/06)
• How to Identify a Successful Election (10/10/06)
• Will the Election System Function Properly This Year? (9/5/06)
• Election Law at the High Court: Big Cases Leave Little Footprints (8/18/06)
• Ohio is not Mexico, but … (7/25/06)
• Justice Kennedy Deserves Praise, Part II (7/3/06)
• First Impressions of the Partisan Gerrymandering Portion of the Texas Case (6/28/06)
• The Importance of Randall's Indecisiveness (6/27/06)
• Online Voter Registration is the Answer (6/13/06)
• A Way to Rescue Redistricting Reform (6/6/06)
• Is Bipartisan Redistricting Reform Achievable? (5/19/06)
• Electoral Laments in Major and Minor Keys (5/9/06)
• Papers from Princeton Conference: Pildes, others (5/2/06)
• A Review of the Transcript in the Texas Redistricting Case (4/4/06)
• Will the Expansion of Absentee Voting Yield an Increase in Abuse? (3/28/06)
• Incrementalist Election Law? (3/7/06)
• A Guide to the District-Specific Claims in the Texas Oral Argument (3/2/06)
• Politics and Race a Messy Mix in Argument on Texas Case (3/1/06)
• Further Thoughts on the Vermont Oral Argument (2/28/06)
• Majority of Court Skeptical of Vermont Campaign Finance Law (2/28/06)
• Precedent and the Constitutional Law of Elections (2/24/06)
• Doubleheader Tests the Court's Impartiality: EL@M to host Electronic Roundtable on Pending Pair (2/14/06)
• The Remand in WRTL (2/7/06)
• The Roberts Court and Precedent: An Early Test in the Context of Campaign Finance (1/17/06)
• Will Election Law Become Clearer This Year? (1/3/06)

2005

• The Federalism Defect in the Prosecution of Tom DeLay (11/29/05)
• Future Redistricting Reform Must Learn From This Year's Mistakes (11/15/05)
• The Ten Most Urgent Election Reforms (11/8/05)
• How to Avoid an Electoral Katrina (11/7/05)
• If not Issue 4, then what? Would opponents sign on to Arnold 's approach? (11/1/05)
• Issue 3 is a Big Mistake (11/1/05)
• Analysis: New and Old Arguments for Campaign Spending Limits: Will Any Convince the Court? (10/18/05)
• The Significance of Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (10/13/05)
• Federal Courts Should Not Run State Elections (10/4/05)
• The Need for a Fair Referee (9/24/05)
• How to Hire a Fair Election Law Umpire? (9/13/05)
• Is There a Middle Ground in the Voter ID Debate? (9/6/05)
• What Should the New Justice Do About Campaign Finance? (7/19/05)
• Fact-Specific Election Law (7/5/05)
• Refusing to Unseat a Governor Despite a Flawed Election (6/7/05)
• The People and their Constitution (5/24/05)
• The Filibuster and Democracy (5/17/05)
• The Provisional Ballots of Unregistered Voters (4/5/05)
• Verifying Voter Registration Lists, Part 2 (3/29/05)
• Verifying Voter Registration Lists (3/22/05)
• When to Redo an Election? (1/25/05)

2004

• Minimizing the Need for Provisional Ballots: A Reform Worth Wishing For (12/21/04)
• How to Achieve Maximum Disclosure of "Electioneering Communications"? (12/15/04)
• Analysis of Proposed Ohio Campaign Finance Bill (SB1/HB1): Electioneering Communication Provisions (12/13/04)
• Investing in Politicians to Boost Corporate Profits (12/7/04)
• When Should a Presidential Election Be Over? (11/17/04)
• Problems with Provisional Ballots (11/11/04)
• Election 2004 in Ohio: Some Unanswered Questions (11/10/04)
• Voting Machines Per Capita: a Bush v. Gore Issue? (11/5/04)
• Justice Stevens' Words of Hope – and Caution (11/2/04)
• Sixth Circuit Opinions in Polling Place Challenges Cases: A Preliminary Analysis (11/2/04)
• Judge Adams' Order in Summit County Parallels Judge Dlott's Ruling in Spencer, But Is Unclear in One Respect (11/1/04)
• Judge Dlott's 11/1 Order Barring Challengers Statewide: A Preliminary Analysis (11/1/04)
• The Nine In a Pickle (10/28/04)
• Latest Developments & Current Situation: An Assessment (10/24/04)
• Blackwell Files Appellate Brief in Provisional Ballot Case (10/21/04)
• Blackwell's Mixed Record So Far (10/5/04)
• Let the Sunshine In (9/28/04)
• Lying to Win (9/21/04)
• Welcome to Election Law @ Moritz (7/20/04)
• Election Law 5-to-4 (7/6/04)
• Comparing Two Cases (6/29/04)
• The Missed Opportunity of Vieth (6/22/04)
• The Necessity of Law for Democracy (6/15/04)

Election Law @ Moritz | Professor Edward B. Foley, Director | electionlaw@osu.edu
Please note: Election Law @ Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law @ Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law @ Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation, but individuals affiliated with the program may from time to time in their own personal capacity engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.

The Ohio State University | Michael E. Moritz College of Law | 55 West 12th Avenue | Columbus, OH 43210-1391 | (614) 292-2631