1. Help
2. Campus map
3. Find people
4. Webmail
5. Search Ohio State

• About
  EL@M
  • About Us
  • Experts by Topic
• Faculty
  • Edward B. "Ned" Foley
  • Daniel P. Tokaji
  • Terri L. Enns
  • Steven F. Huefner
  • Donald B. Tobin
  • EL@M Fellows
  • EL@M Staff
  • Experts by Topic
• Election Law
  Litigation
  • Major Pending Cases
  • Archived Cases
• Current
  Features
  • 2008 Primary Post-Election Timeline
  • Voting Machine Issues Nationwide (2008)
  • From Registration to Recounts (Book)
  • Voter ID Litigation Nationwide
  • Major Election Law Reports
  • Equal Vote
  • Free & Fair
  • Weekly Teleconference
  • Featured Comments
• Archived
  Features
  • 50 Questions for 5 Key States
  • 2006 Election Overview
  • 2006 Recount Roundup
  • 2006 Ohio Primary Problems
  • 2006 Voting Technology Nationwide
  • 2006 Election Podcasts
  • Electronic Roundtable '06
  • Ohio Voter Registration Regulations
  • e-Book
  • Past Case Decisions
  • 2005 Redistricting Developments
• Biweekly
  Update
  • Subscribe
• Related
  Links
• Media
  Information
• A Joint Project with the
  Moritz Law Library

Election Law @ Moritz hosted an Electronic Roundtable on two cases recently argued before the Supreme Court. On Tuesday, February 28, the Court heard arguments in Randall v. Sorrell, a case challenging Vermont's limits on campaign expenditures and contributions. The next day, Wednesday, March 1, the Court heard arguments on League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry and consolidated cases, which concern Texas' mid-decade congressional redistricting (or "re-redistricting").

Previous Posts

• Edward B. Foley - Final Post... Incrementalist Election Law? (3/7/2006)
• Edward B. Foley - A Guide to the District-Specific Claims in the Texas Oral Argument (3/2/2006)
• Bradley A. Smith - Fooling the Court (3/1/2006)
• Edward B. Foley - Politics and Race a Messy Mix in Argument on Texas Case (3/1/2006)
• Bradley A. Smith - Brad Smith replies to Rick Pildes (3/1/2006)
• Edward B. Foley - Further Thoughts on the Vermont Oral Argument (2/28/2006)
• Edward B. Foley - Majority of Court Skeptical of Vermont Campaign Finance Law (2/28/2006)
• Daniel Lowenstein - On Election Law Jurisprudence (2/28/2006)
• Richard L. Hasen - How to Decide the Texas Redistricting Cases (2/28/2006)
• Richard H. Pildes - Political Competition, Redistricting, and the Texas Case (2/28/2006)
• Richard L. Hasen - How to Decide the Vermont Campaign Finance Case (2/27/2006)
• Richard H. Pildes - Campaign Finance and Political Competition (2/27/2006)
• Daniel Lowenstein - On Campaign Spending Limits (2/24/2006)
• Edward B. Foley - Precedent and the Constitutional Law of Elections (2/24/2006)
• Bradley A. Smith - Randall v. Sorrell: It's Not Just Spending Limits (2/23/2006)
• Richard L. Hasen - The Nature of Judicial Modesty (2/23/2006)
• Daniel Lowenstein - On Partisan Gerrymandering and Mid-Decade Redistricting (2/22/2006)
• Richard H. Pildes Political Competition and The Constitution (2/22/2006)
• Richard L. Hasen - Modest or Bold?: The Roberts Court's Choice in Election Cases (2/21/2006)
• Bradley A. Smith - The Court's Task is Faithful Interpretation of the Constitution (2/21/2006)
• Daniel P. Tokaji - The Roberts Court and the Law of Democracy (2/21/2006)
• Edward B. Foley - Doubleheader Tests the Court's Impartiality: EL@M to host Electronic Roundtable on Pending Pair (2/14/2006)

Election Law @ Moritz | Professor Edward B. Foley, Director | electionlaw@osu.edu
Please note: Election Law @ Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law @ Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law @ Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation, but individuals affiliated with the program may from time to time in their own personal capacity engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.

The Ohio State University | Michael E. Moritz College of Law | 55 West 12th Avenue | Columbus, OH 43210-1391 | (614) 292-2631