Posted: May 8, 2012
NEOCH Plaintiffs File Motion to Halt Legislators' Ohio Supreme Court Action
The Plaintiffs in the federal NEOCH v. Brunner case filed a motion today in the district court to enjoin related proceedings in the Ohio Supreme Court instituted by Ohio legislators Thomas Niehaus and Louis Blessing. The NEOCH plaintiffs are asking the district court to enjoin the legislators from further prosecuting the state court proceedings and show cause why they are not in contempt for violating the district court's 2010 consent decree. The legislators' mandamus action in the Ohio Supreme Court seeks an order requiring the Ohio Secretary of State to rescind directives issued pursuant to the consent decree. The directives permit provisional ballots to be counted even if cast in the wrong precinct or if some signature requirements are not fully complied with for reasons attributable to poll-worker error. The legislators assert that the Ohio Secretary of State did not have the authority under the Ohio Constitution to issue the directives because the directives effectively amend law created by the legislature.


Commentary
Arizona: Voter Registration and the Road Ahead
Justin Levitt
June arrived with two election law cases at the Supreme Court. One is still pending: a highly anticipated decision on section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The other, more frequently overlooked, was decided yesterday. And there are some quirks of the opinion that seem to depart from the swiftly congealing conventional wisdom that the states might actually have "won," and now need only run out the clock.
more commentary...