OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Information & Analysis

OH Provisional Ballot Case Developments

Yesterday brought two developments in Ohio regarding provisional ballot counting. First, Ohio Senate President Niehaus and Ohio House Speaker Pro Tempore Blessing filed a mandamus action in the Ohio Supreme Court to require the Secretary of State to rescind directives issued pursuant to a consent decree resulting from the federal NEOCH v. Brunner case. The directives permit provisional ballots to be counted even if cast in the wrong precinct or if some signature requirements are not fully complied with for reasons attributable to poll-worker error. The complaint claims that constitutional separation of powers do not permit the Secretary of State to amend or modify laws passed by the General Assembly without authorization from the General Assembly.

In another provisional ballot case, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals denied the Hamilton County Board of Elections request for a stay of the District Court’s decision that provisional ballots cast in the wrong precinct, again due to poll-worker error, should be counted. This case relies on a federal equal protection claim, as some wrong-precinct ballots, cast wrongly due to poll-worker error, were counted.

Commentary

Justin   Levitt

Arizona: Voter Registration and the Road Ahead

Justin Levitt

 

June arrived with two election law cases at the Supreme Court. One is still pending: a highly anticipated decision on section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The other, more frequently overlooked, was decided yesterday. And there are some quirks of the opinion that seem to depart from the swiftly congealing conventional wisdom that the states might actually have "won," and now need only run out the clock.

more commentary...

In the News

Michelle  Alexander

Johnson: Disenfranchising felons hits minorities hardest

Professor Michelle Alexander was quoted in an Athens Banner-Herald article from her book "The New Jim Crow." The article focuses on the disenfranchisement of felons in states like Virginia, where more than seven percent of the adult population cannot vote due to felony charges. In Virginia, Gov. Robert McDonnell is taking steps to restore the right to vote to nonviolent felons.

Alexander's book calls on the idea that disenfranchising felons affects minorities most. She calls voting-rights restoration processes a “bureaucratic maze” that is “cumbersome, confusing and onerous.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court: NVRA Pre-empts Arizona's Proof of Citizenship Law

In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the NVRA preempts an Arizona law requiring documentation of citizenship to accompany voter registration forms. The case is Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.

more info & analysis...