Posted: October 18, 2011
Ohio Supreme Court Allows Referendum to Proceed in Redistricting Case
In an opinion released October 14, the Ohio Supreme Court granted the writ of mandamus requested by Ohioans for Fair Districts and Democratic legislators. The court's ruling compels the Ohio Secretary of State to treat recently passed redistricting legislation by the Republican-controlled General Assembly as subject to referendum. Citing its own precedent and the text of the Ohio Constitutional provisions on referendum, the court determined that the inclusion of appropriations for current state expenses, in addition to the challenged redistricting sections, did not exempt the Act from the possibility of referendum. Under Article II, section 1c of the Ohio Constitution, challengers of the Act now have 90 days from the Act's passage to gather sufficient signatures for a referendum on the November 2012 ballot. WIth a March primary and a December 7 filing deadline for candidates, there remains much uncertainty about the future boundaries of Ohio's Congressional districts.


Commentary
Arizona: Voter Registration and the Road Ahead
Justin Levitt
June arrived with two election law cases at the Supreme Court. One is still pending: a highly anticipated decision on section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The other, more frequently overlooked, was decided yesterday. And there are some quirks of the opinion that seem to depart from the swiftly congealing conventional wisdom that the states might actually have "won," and now need only run out the clock.
more commentary...