OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Information & Analysis

Sixth Circuit Issues Stay in Ohio Provisional Ballot Case

The Sixth Circuit today (1/18) issued an order granting a stay in the Hamilton County Juvenile Court provisional ballots case.  This follows a flurry of motions over the last few days, including an amicus brief from the Ohio Secretary of State.  Oral arguments are set for Thursday, January 20.  For a complete listing of the documents filed in this case, see our Major Pending Cases page for the case.

 

The Sixth Circuit's stay essentially freezes the status quo until the appeals court has a chance to review the merits.  Characterizing the case as "difficult," with "complex" and "contested" facts, and presenting "serious questions on their merits," the stay order was careful not to tip its hand which way it might ultimately rule. The 3-judge panel (Moore, Cole, Rogers) essentially explained the need for the stay as to avoid the "difficult position in which the [Hamilty County] Board [of Elections] finds itself": subject to two "conflicting orders" from the federal district court and the Ohio Supreme Court while the potential of "its members fac[ing] contempt proceedings if they do not carry out the district court's order."  Merits briefs from all parties are due 3 p.m. Wednesday, in advance of Thursday oral argument at 5 p.m.

Commentary

Donald B. Tobin

FAQ on social welfare organizations

Donald B. Tobin

The Frank E. and Virginia H. Bazler Designated Professor in Business Law and a senior fellow at Election Law @ Moritz explains the nuances of social welfare organizations and federal regulations related to them.

more commentary...

In the News

Donald B. Tobin

How Did The IRS Get The Job Of Vetting Political Activity?

Professor Donald Tobin was interviewed by the Boston NPR station on its show Here & Now about the Internal Revenue Service's investigation into groups classified as social welfare organizations (marked by the 501(c)(4) tax classification). The IRS was in search of groups that are not focusing primarly on the social welfare of the country, but have a strong political advocacy facet. Political advocacy groups might want to be classified as 501(c)(4) organizations because under that classification they do not have to disclose their donors.

"The key is if you going to be engaged in candidate-type advocacy, and if you're going to intervene in elections and engage in election advocacy, we want disclosure of who your donors are," Tobin said.

“What groups are trying to do here is avoid having to disclose,” Tobin continued. “By earning the classification of social welfare, they’re avoiding the campaign disclosure that’s required for political organizations. So that’s really the underpinning of why we have this mess of the IRS having to get in and investigate and figure out whether an organization is political or not.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Ohio House Committee Recommends Upholding Landis' Election Victory

Yesterday, an Ohio House of Representatives committee recommended 5-4 that the Ohio House uphold the election victory of Republican State Representative Al Landis over Democratic challenger Josh O'Farrell. In February, the Ohio Supreme Court sent the O'Farrell v. Landis record to the House for consideration. According to an article in the Canton Repository, committee chairman and State Representative Matt Huffman said he expects a vote by the full House later this month.

more info & analysis...