OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz

Information & Analysis

Recount Procedures in Colorado

The Denver Post is reporting that  the Colorado Senate race between incumbent Democrat Michael Bennet and his Republican challenger, Ken Buck, is now decided in Bennet's favor, although with a fairly narrow margin. If the vote tallying trend for Bennet reverses, the race could head for a recount. But the recount might not happen for a few weeks because Colorado election law allows time for both the canvassing boards and the Secretary of State to tally the results.


November 19th: Date by which canvassing boards must certify results of the election to Secretary of State. Colo. Rev. State. § 1-10-101.5.

November 26th: Date by which Secretary of State must compile and total the returns and order a recount if necessary. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-10-103.

Recounts can occur in two ways in Colorado. The first is an automatic recount that is triggered when the margin of votes between the winning candidate and the next highest candidate is less than 0.5% of the votes cast for the winning candidate. Colo. Rev. State. § 1-10.5-101. Currently, this statute would not be triggered because the vote margin is only 0.9% of the total votes received by Bennet. However, Buck would only need to pick up about 53% of the 100,000 votes outstanding to trigger an automatic recount. This seems likely given the number of military votes yet to be counted.

The second is when a losing candidate or other interested party requests a recount. Colo. Stat. 1-10.5-106. When recounts take this form, the requesting party bears the expense of the recount. This money is placed in escrow and will be returned if the recount reverses the result of the election. Requests for a recount must be made before the November 26th deadline.

At any time during the recount process, a party to the recount may challenge the recount if the party believes that it is being conducted unfairly. Recounts can be challenged on a county-by-county basis at which time the Secretary of State will then conduct the recount. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-10.5-109.

The Secretary of State recently issued amended rules on recounts that spell out in detail the actual procedures to be used by the canvassing boards. Those rules can be found here.

Another wrinkle to consider is that the Secretary of State in Colorado, Bernie Buescher, a Democrat, will likely be defeated by his Republican challenger, Scott Gessler, as Buescher currently trails by over 100,000 votes. How a new chief elections official might handle a contentious recount is interesting.

If partisanship does become an issue, it is important to note that five of the seven Colorado Supreme Court Justices were appointed by Democrats.


Daniel P. Tokaji

What's the Matter with Kobach?

Daniel P. Tokaji

By "Kobach," I mean the Kobach v. EAC case in which the Tenth Circuit heard oral argument Monday – rather than its lead plaintiff, Kansas’ controversial Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who argued the position of his state and the State of Arizona. This post discusses what’s at issue in the case, where the district court went wrong, and what the Tenth Circuit should do.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Judge Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction in NC Case

U.S. District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder denied the motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs in a case challenging a new North Carolina voting law as violating the Voting Rights Act and the federal Constitution. Judge Schroeder also denied the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory.

more info & analysis...