OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Information & Analysis

Recount Procedures in Colorado

The Denver Post is reporting that  the Colorado Senate race between incumbent Democrat Michael Bennet and his Republican challenger, Ken Buck, is now decided in Bennet's favor, although with a fairly narrow margin. If the vote tallying trend for Bennet reverses, the race could head for a recount. But the recount might not happen for a few weeks because Colorado election law allows time for both the canvassing boards and the Secretary of State to tally the results.

Timeline:

November 19th: Date by which canvassing boards must certify results of the election to Secretary of State. Colo. Rev. State. § 1-10-101.5.

November 26th: Date by which Secretary of State must compile and total the returns and order a recount if necessary. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-10-103.

Recounts can occur in two ways in Colorado. The first is an automatic recount that is triggered when the margin of votes between the winning candidate and the next highest candidate is less than 0.5% of the votes cast for the winning candidate. Colo. Rev. State. § 1-10.5-101. Currently, this statute would not be triggered because the vote margin is only 0.9% of the total votes received by Bennet. However, Buck would only need to pick up about 53% of the 100,000 votes outstanding to trigger an automatic recount. This seems likely given the number of military votes yet to be counted.

The second is when a losing candidate or other interested party requests a recount. Colo. Stat. 1-10.5-106. When recounts take this form, the requesting party bears the expense of the recount. This money is placed in escrow and will be returned if the recount reverses the result of the election. Requests for a recount must be made before the November 26th deadline.

At any time during the recount process, a party to the recount may challenge the recount if the party believes that it is being conducted unfairly. Recounts can be challenged on a county-by-county basis at which time the Secretary of State will then conduct the recount. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-10.5-109.

The Secretary of State recently issued amended rules on recounts that spell out in detail the actual procedures to be used by the canvassing boards. Those rules can be found here.

Another wrinkle to consider is that the Secretary of State in Colorado, Bernie Buescher, a Democrat, will likely be defeated by his Republican challenger, Scott Gessler, as Buescher currently trails by over 100,000 votes. How a new chief elections official might handle a contentious recount is interesting.

If partisanship does become an issue, it is important to note that five of the seven Colorado Supreme Court Justices were appointed by Democrats.

Commentary

Justin   Levitt

Arizona: Voter Registration and the Road Ahead

Justin Levitt

 

June arrived with two election law cases at the Supreme Court. One is still pending: a highly anticipated decision on section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The other, more frequently overlooked, was decided yesterday. And there are some quirks of the opinion that seem to depart from the swiftly congealing conventional wisdom that the states might actually have "won," and now need only run out the clock.

more commentary...

In the News

Michelle  Alexander

Johnson: Disenfranchising felons hits minorities hardest

Professor Michelle Alexander was quoted in an Athens Banner-Herald article from her book "The New Jim Crow." The article focuses on the disenfranchisement of felons in states like Virginia, where more than seven percent of the adult population cannot vote due to felony charges. In Virginia, Gov. Robert McDonnell is taking steps to restore the right to vote to nonviolent felons.

Alexander's book calls on the idea that disenfranchising felons affects minorities most. She calls voting-rights restoration processes a “bureaucratic maze” that is “cumbersome, confusing and onerous.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court: NVRA Pre-empts Arizona's Proof of Citizenship Law

In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the NVRA preempts an Arizona law requiring documentation of citizenship to accompany voter registration forms. The case is Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.

more info & analysis...