OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz

Information & Analysis

NY-20 update - Tedisco challenges Gillibrand's ballot

Candidate Jim Tedisco has challenged the ballot of Senator Kirsten Gillibrand who used to hold the seat he now seeks in Congress. Challengers allege that she was in the county on election day and should have voted in person. Senator Gillibrand says she was not in the county and that Tedisco is targeting Democratic voters unfairly. A judge is expected to rule soon on the counting of some challenged ballots and the possibility of extending the deadline for military and overseas ballots.  Murphy currently leads by 86 votes.  See today’s Saratogian coverage here. New York law allows persons who will be out of the county on election day to vote by absentee ballot. 8-400. The voter must sign a statement on the ballot application affirming that he or she “expects in good faith” to fall into one of the categories of voters who may vote absentee. Challengers may challenge voters on the grounds that they were not entitled to cast an absentee ballot. 8-506. 

Voting both by absentee ballot and in person on election day is controversial. During the 2008 presidential primaries, a New Jersey county court ruled that voters who cast their ballots before some candidates pulled out of the presidential race could get a replacement absentee ballot. In Minnesota, voters who cast an absentee ballot may vote in person without penalty; their absentee ballot is then not to be counted because poll workers should see that the voter signed the poll roster and voted in person before opening the voter’s absentee ballot. The practice is not necessarily encouraged but it is permitted. Some argue that actively allowing a second ballot to be issued to a voter unfairly gives that voter two chances to vote even if only one ballot is ultimately counted. In New York, when two absentee ballots are received from one voter, the one that is dated earlier in time is opened and counted. 8-506. This may imply a preference in New York election law for counting a voter’s first set of choices rather than giving the voter a second chance to make his or her voting decisions. 


Edward B. Foley

Of Bouncing Balls and a Big Blue Shift

Edward B. Foley

It is a fortuitous coincidence that the University of Virginia’s Journal of Law & Politics has just published a piece of mine that shows the relevance of the current vote-counting process in Virginia’s Attorney General election to what might happen if the 2016 presidential election turns on a similar vote-counting process in Virginia. 

Read full post here.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Judge Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction in NC Case

U.S. District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder denied the motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs in a case challenging a new North Carolina voting law as violating the Voting Rights Act and the federal Constitution. Judge Schroeder also denied the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory.

more info & analysis...

Related News Wire Stories