OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Information & Analysis

Colorado SoS Race: Gap Exceeds Uncounted Ballots

The AP now reports that less than 13,000 uncounted ballots remain in Democratic-leaning counties, thereby making it mathematically impossible for Ken Gordon to overtake Mike Coffman’s 21,163-vote lead as of Monday afternoon. In fact, AP also quotes Gordon as saying, “If those numbers are accurate, then I wish Mike Coffman the best in his new job.” But this statement was not yet a formal concession of defeat. From this statement as well as previous ones, however, it does appear that Gordon would be unwilling to pursue litigation in an effort to overturn the result of the election if, as is now virtually certain, the final count of the ballot shows him coming up short. One possible basis for such litigation (at least theoretically), were Gordon of a different mindset, would be that an unknown number of voters were prevented from casting ballots last Tuesday as a result of polling place problems. As another report today recounted, these problems were not confined to Denver, but extended elsewhere: Davidson County saw polling place lines of over 5 and ½ hours in length. Even so, it would appear difficult for any such litigation raising this kind of claim to document enough disenfranchised voters statewide to attack a 20,000, or even 10,000, vote victory among ballots actually cast. Gordon, assuming he loses this Secretary of State election, still can go back to his current job as majority leader in the state’s Senate. The polling place problems in Colorado, however, still have the potential of affecting some other races in the state, including a Denver tax levy for which “yes” votes exceed “no” votes by about 1500.

Commentary

Donald B. Tobin

FAQ on social welfare organizations

Donald B. Tobin

The Frank E. and Virginia H. Bazler Designated Professor in Business Law and a senior fellow at Election Law @ Moritz explains the nuances of social welfare organizations and federal regulations related to them.

more commentary...

In the News

Donald B. Tobin

How Did The IRS Get The Job Of Vetting Political Activity?

Professor Donald Tobin was interviewed by the Boston NPR station on its show Here & Now about the Internal Revenue Service's investigation into groups classified as social welfare organizations (marked by the 501(c)(4) tax classification). The IRS was in search of groups that are not focusing primarly on the social welfare of the country, but have a strong political advocacy facet. Political advocacy groups might want to be classified as 501(c)(4) organizations because under that classification they do not have to disclose their donors.

"The key is if you going to be engaged in candidate-type advocacy, and if you're going to intervene in elections and engage in election advocacy, we want disclosure of who your donors are," Tobin said.

“What groups are trying to do here is avoid having to disclose,” Tobin continued. “By earning the classification of social welfare, they’re avoiding the campaign disclosure that’s required for political organizations. So that’s really the underpinning of why we have this mess of the IRS having to get in and investigate and figure out whether an organization is political or not.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Ohio House Committee Recommends Upholding Landis' Election Victory

Yesterday, an Ohio House of Representatives committee recommended 5-4 that the Ohio House uphold the election victory of Republican State Representative Al Landis over Democratic challenger Josh O'Farrell. In February, the Ohio Supreme Court sent the O'Farrell v. Landis record to the House for consideration. According to an article in the Canton Repository, committee chairman and State Representative Matt Huffman said he expects a vote by the full House later this month.

more info & analysis...