OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Information & Analysis

NC-8: Headed for Recount?

North Carolina’s 8th District Congressional race will be susceptible to a recount, unless uncounted provisional ballots dramatically alter the existing situation. As of November 13, the Fayetteville Observer reports Republican Robin Hayes leading his Democratic opponent, Larry Kissel, by 465 votes (in another story, the paper reported the difference at 440). The most recent figures from the North Carolina State Board of Elections indicate the total number of ballots cast was 120,497. Assuming 120,497 as the final figure, Kissell will be able to file for a recount provided the final margin of victory is less than 1,205 votes. This is because North Carolina law allows an unsuccessful candidate for US House to obtain a recount any time the margin of victory falls under one percent of the total vote. N.C.G.S. 163-182.7(c)(1). The margin that would result from the above figures is approximately one fourth of one percent, well within the required margin. However, as of November 13, the Fayetteville Observer reports that 1,492 outstanding provisional ballots remain to be counted, ballots which could potentially take Kissell out of the “recount zone.” Kissell remains optimistic that these provisional votes will carry him to victory, but the State Board of Elections has indicated that historically thirty to forty percent of those ballots are disqualified and not counted. Due to this disqualification, it is expected that Kissell will have to pick up three out of every four provisional ballots to win the race. The Fayetteville Observer reports that provisional ballots results will be added to the final tally on November 17, when local election boards certify their results. N.C.G.S.A. s 163-182.7 (amended by S.L. 2005-428) states that a candidate desiring a recount must file a petition with the State Board of Elections by noon on the second business day after the county canvass. In contrast, the Fayetteville Observer states that the deadline is “within 24 hours of certification.” At any rate, the same Observer report states that officials interpret the law to require a recount petition to be filed by Monday, November 20th. However, North Carolina law supplies an alternative deadline where local numbers are partial or flawed. If new numbers become available that show the candidate is entitled to a recount where before due to incorrect numbers it appeared he or she was not, the State Board of Elections will notify the candidate. Id. The candidate then has forty-eight hours to petition for a recount. Id. Officials may also order a recount at their discretion when they determine it is “necessary to complete the canvass in an election.” Id. News reports did not contain accounts of malfunctioning machines, voter intimidation, long lines, or any of the other problems that persist in other jurisdictions. However, the candidates are clearly on the lookout for irregularities: Hayes requested a copy of all provisional ballots prior to their review. Nathan Cemenska, Web Editor, contributed this article.

Commentary

Justin   Levitt

Arizona: Voter Registration and the Road Ahead

Justin Levitt

 

June arrived with two election law cases at the Supreme Court. One is still pending: a highly anticipated decision on section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The other, more frequently overlooked, was decided yesterday. And there are some quirks of the opinion that seem to depart from the swiftly congealing conventional wisdom that the states might actually have "won," and now need only run out the clock.

more commentary...

In the News

Michelle  Alexander

Johnson: Disenfranchising felons hits minorities hardest

Professor Michelle Alexander was quoted in an Athens Banner-Herald article from her book "The New Jim Crow." The article focuses on the disenfranchisement of felons in states like Virginia, where more than seven percent of the adult population cannot vote due to felony charges. In Virginia, Gov. Robert McDonnell is taking steps to restore the right to vote to nonviolent felons.

Alexander's book calls on the idea that disenfranchising felons affects minorities most. She calls voting-rights restoration processes a “bureaucratic maze” that is “cumbersome, confusing and onerous.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Supreme Court: NVRA Pre-empts Arizona's Proof of Citizenship Law

In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the NVRA preempts an Arizona law requiring documentation of citizenship to accompany voter registration forms. The case is Arizona v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.

more info & analysis...

Related News Wire Stories

more newswire...