OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz

Information & Analysis

No news yet in the Minnesota Senate contest

The contest court has not issued any orders yet this week in the Coleman v. Franken contest.  Last Friday, the contest court heard closing arguments in the case. This week the parties submitted their findings of fact and conclusions of law documents. Franken is asking the court to consider 430 rejected absentee ballots. He introduced complete evidence for 252 of these. Coleman seeks to have 1,369 rejected absentees counted by the court. See the Star Tribune coverage here. Yesterday, several reports revealed that Coleman attorney Joe Friedberg thinks the trial outcome will likely favor Franken but that an appeals court will have to decide the constitutional issues that Coleman’s team presented in their case. See the MinnPost.com coverage here. The Star Tribune also has a nice timeline of recount and contest events here.


Edward B. Foley

Of Bouncing Balls and a Big Blue Shift

Edward B. Foley

It is a fortuitous coincidence that the University of Virginia’s Journal of Law & Politics has just published a piece of mine that shows the relevance of the current vote-counting process in Virginia’s Attorney General election to what might happen if the 2016 presidential election turns on a similar vote-counting process in Virginia. 

Read full post here.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Judge Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction in NC Case

U.S. District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder denied the motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs in a case challenging a new North Carolina voting law as violating the Voting Rights Act and the federal Constitution. Judge Schroeder also denied the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory.

more info & analysis...