OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Information & Analysis

NM-1: Counting Should End this Week

New Mexico’s close 1st District Congressional race may end in a recount or an election contest. As of November 13, the Albuquerque Journal-Tribune reports candidate Heather Wilson (R) leads opponent Patricia Madrid (D) by 1,487 votes, with 3,756 ballots outstanding. Of these, the newspaper reports 2,698 are provisional ballots, and the rest absentee. Wilson’s lead represents about seven-tenths of one percent of the total vote. Representatives of both candidates met with elections officials on Sunday to develop procedures for counting the outstanding provisional ballots (details here). An attorney for the state Democratic Party reportedly filed a lawsuit on November 8 to clarify those procedures, and representatives of both parties have pointed to provisional ballots as a likely area for further dispute. In 2004, less than half of provisional ballots were counted. Moreover, even before Election Day, litigation was pending over voter identification rules, and it is possible that those ID-related claims could be folded into litigation over the review of provisional ballots. Counting is expected to end sometime this week. New Mexico law allows an apparent losing candidate to obtain a recount where the candidate “believes that any error or fraud has been committed….” N.M.S.A. 1978, s 1-14-14. The candidate must file a recount petition within six days after “completion of the canvass by the proper canvassing board….” Id. However, a candidate desiring a recount might also be able to obtain one by filing an election contest lawsuit under N.M.S.A. 1978, s 1-14-1. The wording of New Mexico’s election contest statute is very broad and simply states that an unsuccessful candidate may contest an election after the results are certified. Id. Based on this broad language, the Supreme Court of New Mexico has held that recounts and election contests are not mutually exclusive. Weldon v. Sanders, 655 P.2d 1004, 1007 (1982). In Weldon, the court permitted a candidate to obtain a recount-type examination of write-in votes by bringing an election contest on allegations that “he had received a majority of the votes cast, and that the improper conduct of the election officials in refusing to count certain votes deprived him of victory.” Id. Beyond this narrow situation, it is unclear what recount-type remedies are available in an election contest. Several election-related controversies emerged in the 1st District, some of which might be pursued in an election contest. Democrats have already sued the state Republican Party in the 2nd District state court for allegedly calling Democratic voters and misdirecting them to incorrect polling places. A Republican Party representative called this lawsuit “junk” and stated that it was designed to stop the Party from conducting legitimate get-out-the-vote efforts. It is unclear at this point whether under New Mexico law allegations of this nature, even if true, could form the basis of overturning the result of an election. In addition, on Election Day, two precincts ran out of ballots only two hours into voting and began turning voters away. The state Republican Party threatened legal action, but did not follow through. These allegations conceivably could be raised in a contest of the election, although at this point it appears doubtful that they would be large enough by themselves to overcome the 1500-vote margin that presently stands. The Journal-Tribune also reports that tabulating machines in one county malfunctioned, requiring that ballots be counted by hand. However, representatives of both the Democratic and Republican parties stated they did not think this problem was severe enough to create a dispute. Other problems included one polling place running out of pens, another opening one hour late, and long lines in early voting. In New Mexico, an election contest must be filed no later than thirty days after the successful candidate is issued a certificate of election. N.M.S.A. 1978, s 1-14-3. Further details about New Mexico recount and election contest procedures may be found in NM ADC 1.10.22. Nathan Cemenska contributed this article.

Commentary

Daniel P. Tokaji

What's the Matter with Kobach?

Daniel P. Tokaji

By "Kobach," I mean the Kobach v. EAC case in which the Tenth Circuit heard oral argument Monday – rather than its lead plaintiff, Kansas’ controversial Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who argued the position of his state and the State of Arizona. This post discusses what’s at issue in the case, where the district court went wrong, and what the Tenth Circuit should do.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Judge Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction in NC Case

U.S. District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder denied the motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs in a case challenging a new North Carolina voting law as violating the Voting Rights Act and the federal Constitution. Judge Schroeder also denied the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory.

more info & analysis...

Related News Wire Stories