OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz

Information & Analysis

Day 6 of Minnesota election contest trial complete

Today was Day 6 of the Minnesota election contest trial. Ramsey County Elections Director Joe Mansky was on the stand most of the day. He was questioned by Franken’s attorney about the practices in his county of reviewing the absentee ballot acceptance/rejection process. After last week’s trial proceedings, the Coleman campaign pointed out that Mansky said the election judges had 15 seconds to look at the ballot envelopes. Mansky clarified today that he hand-picked two election judges from his staff to review the rejected absentee ballots for mistakes, that they took as much time as they needed to review them in accordance with the court order, and that he was very confident that they had corrected any errors in his county. Coleman also called two voters at the end of the day whose ballots had not been counted. One voter apparently forgot to sign her absentee ballot envelope and the other voter’s ballot appears to have been rejected because there was no ballot application with his signature on it to be compared to his ballot even though he voted absentee in person at an elections office and his ballot was witnessed by an elections employee. See the latest Star Tribune story here and MPR story here. Mr. Mansky educated trial watchers today about Minnesota’s law requiring counties with absentee ballot boards to give voters another chance to vote absentee if they return their ballot before 5 days before the election and made a technical error on the envelope. However, not all counties and cities have absentee ballot boards and those that do have them may not convene them until less than 5 days preceding the election. This explains why many voters were not notified of the rejection of their absentee ballots while there was still a chance to correct any mistakes.


Edward B. Foley

Of Bouncing Balls and a Big Blue Shift

Edward B. Foley

It is a fortuitous coincidence that the University of Virginia’s Journal of Law & Politics has just published a piece of mine that shows the relevance of the current vote-counting process in Virginia’s Attorney General election to what might happen if the 2016 presidential election turns on a similar vote-counting process in Virginia. 

Read full post here.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Judge Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction in NC Case

U.S. District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder denied the motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs in a case challenging a new North Carolina voting law as violating the Voting Rights Act and the federal Constitution. Judge Schroeder also denied the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory.

more info & analysis...