OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Information & Analysis

Ohio Provisional Ballots Back in Court

A status conference has been scheduled for 2pm on Monday, November 13, in NEOHC v. Blackwell, the federal-court case that will determine the procedures for determining the eligibility, and then counting, provisional ballots in Ohio. As the New York Times reported today, both sides are hoping to work out an agreement over these procedures by then. One subject of discussion apparently is the method by which partisan observers may monitor the process by which boards of elections make their eligibility determinations and then conduct the conduct of these ballots. This process has the potential, at least theoretically, for affecting the outcome of one statewide and two congressional races, as well as other local elections in the state. According to a report in the Akron Beacon Journal, there remain “more than 211,000” uncounted ballots statewide, although an unspecified portion of these are absentee rather than provisional ballots. The one statewide race that remains undecided, that for Auditor, has apparently tightened somewhat, with Republican Mary Taylor leading Democrat Barbara Sykes by 71,636 votes, or just under 2%. Even so, the chances would seem remote this margin will be overcome by a lopsided pro-Sykes ratio emerging from the uncounted ballots. A similar conclusion regarding the Pryce-Kilroy race for Ohio’s 15th congressional district was reached today by the Columbus Dispatch, in a precinct-by-precinct analysis of the uncounted ballots applicable to that race. (The article is accompanied by maps showing the relative volume of uncounted absentee and provisional ballots in Franklin County precincts.) Yet the newspaper’s own analysis contained reasons for being cautious about its conclusions. The Dispatch explained that it assumed that uncounted ballots within each precinct would track the same ratio as the counted ballots from the same precinct. Yet the newspaper noted that “[p]rovisional ballots usually skew Democratic,” which would give Kilroy a gain even larger than the 1800 net votes she would pick up according to the paper’s precinct-by-precinct assumed ratio. The Dispatch also observed, however, that not all provisional ballots can expect to be counted, because some percentage will presumably be ruled ineligible. “In 2004, 15 percent of provisional ballots were rejected in Franklin County,” adds the Dispatch. The higher this ineligibility percentage, the harder it is for Kilroy to make up the 3,536-vote difference she currently faces, according to the Secretary of State’s unofficial results. Consequently, it can be expected that the Kilroy campaign will scrutinize closely the rules for evaluating the eligibility of provisional ballots that emerge from Monday’s proceedings in federal court. Meanwhile, with respect to Ohio’s other undecided congressional race, the 2nd District, the Cincinnati Enquirer today published an AP report that reiterated the figure of “roughly 4,700” uncounted ballots applicable to that race, where Republican incumbent Schmidt leads Democratic challenger Wulsin by a 2,323-vote margin. Given the discrepancy between this figure and an earlier Enquirer article, it would seem that this newspaper is now adopting the AP number as its own.

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Of Bouncing Balls and a Big Blue Shift

Edward B. Foley

It is a fortuitous coincidence that the University of Virginia’s Journal of Law & Politics has just published a piece of mine that shows the relevance of the current vote-counting process in Virginia’s Attorney General election to what might happen if the 2016 presidential election turns on a similar vote-counting process in Virginia. 

Read full post here.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Daniel P. Tokaji

Tokaji Testimony for Senate DISCLOSE Hearing

Professor Tokaji has submitted the following writing testimony for today's hearing before the U.S. Senate Rules and Administration Committee on the proposed DISCLOSE Act.

 

more info & analysis...