OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Information & Analysis

Ohio Provisional Ballots Back in Court

A status conference has been scheduled for 2pm on Monday, November 13, in NEOHC v. Blackwell, the federal-court case that will determine the procedures for determining the eligibility, and then counting, provisional ballots in Ohio. As the New York Times reported today, both sides are hoping to work out an agreement over these procedures by then. One subject of discussion apparently is the method by which partisan observers may monitor the process by which boards of elections make their eligibility determinations and then conduct the conduct of these ballots. This process has the potential, at least theoretically, for affecting the outcome of one statewide and two congressional races, as well as other local elections in the state. According to a report in the Akron Beacon Journal, there remain “more than 211,000” uncounted ballots statewide, although an unspecified portion of these are absentee rather than provisional ballots. The one statewide race that remains undecided, that for Auditor, has apparently tightened somewhat, with Republican Mary Taylor leading Democrat Barbara Sykes by 71,636 votes, or just under 2%. Even so, the chances would seem remote this margin will be overcome by a lopsided pro-Sykes ratio emerging from the uncounted ballots. A similar conclusion regarding the Pryce-Kilroy race for Ohio’s 15th congressional district was reached today by the Columbus Dispatch, in a precinct-by-precinct analysis of the uncounted ballots applicable to that race. (The article is accompanied by maps showing the relative volume of uncounted absentee and provisional ballots in Franklin County precincts.) Yet the newspaper’s own analysis contained reasons for being cautious about its conclusions. The Dispatch explained that it assumed that uncounted ballots within each precinct would track the same ratio as the counted ballots from the same precinct. Yet the newspaper noted that “[p]rovisional ballots usually skew Democratic,” which would give Kilroy a gain even larger than the 1800 net votes she would pick up according to the paper’s precinct-by-precinct assumed ratio. The Dispatch also observed, however, that not all provisional ballots can expect to be counted, because some percentage will presumably be ruled ineligible. “In 2004, 15 percent of provisional ballots were rejected in Franklin County,” adds the Dispatch. The higher this ineligibility percentage, the harder it is for Kilroy to make up the 3,536-vote difference she currently faces, according to the Secretary of State’s unofficial results. Consequently, it can be expected that the Kilroy campaign will scrutinize closely the rules for evaluating the eligibility of provisional ballots that emerge from Monday’s proceedings in federal court. Meanwhile, with respect to Ohio’s other undecided congressional race, the 2nd District, the Cincinnati Enquirer today published an AP report that reiterated the figure of “roughly 4,700” uncounted ballots applicable to that race, where Republican incumbent Schmidt leads Democratic challenger Wulsin by a 2,323-vote margin. Given the discrepancy between this figure and an earlier Enquirer article, it would seem that this newspaper is now adopting the AP number as its own.

Commentary

Donald B. Tobin

FAQ on social welfare organizations

Donald B. Tobin

The Frank E. and Virginia H. Bazler Designated Professor in Business Law and a senior fellow at Election Law @ Moritz explains the nuances of social welfare organizations and federal regulations related to them.

more commentary...

In the News

Donald B. Tobin

How Did The IRS Get The Job Of Vetting Political Activity?

Professor Donald Tobin was interviewed by the Boston NPR station on its show Here & Now about the Internal Revenue Service's investigation into groups classified as social welfare organizations (marked by the 501(c)(4) tax classification). The IRS was in search of groups that are not focusing primarly on the social welfare of the country, but have a strong political advocacy facet. Political advocacy groups might want to be classified as 501(c)(4) organizations because under that classification they do not have to disclose their donors.

"The key is if you going to be engaged in candidate-type advocacy, and if you're going to intervene in elections and engage in election advocacy, we want disclosure of who your donors are," Tobin said.

“What groups are trying to do here is avoid having to disclose,” Tobin continued. “By earning the classification of social welfare, they’re avoiding the campaign disclosure that’s required for political organizations. So that’s really the underpinning of why we have this mess of the IRS having to get in and investigate and figure out whether an organization is political or not.”

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Ohio House Committee Recommends Upholding Landis' Election Victory

Yesterday, an Ohio House of Representatives committee recommended 5-4 that the Ohio House uphold the election victory of Republican State Representative Al Landis over Democratic challenger Josh O'Farrell. In February, the Ohio Supreme Court sent the O'Farrell v. Landis record to the House for consideration. According to an article in the Canton Repository, committee chairman and State Representative Matt Huffman said he expects a vote by the full House later this month.

more info & analysis...