OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz


Information & Analysis

Two Ohio Supreme Court justices recuse themselves and other developments in the Myhal/Mahal case

Justices Stratton and O'Connor recused themselves from the case of State ex rel. Mahal v. Brunner.  The justices also recused themselves when the court heard State ex rel Colvin v. Brunner last month in which the court allowed same-day registration and voting to go forward during the 5-day overlap window. Judge William H. Wolff Jr., of the Second Appellate District, sat for Justice Lundberg Stratton and Justice Lynn C. Slaby, of the Ninth Appellate District, sat for Justice O’Connor.  Jugde Wolff was the only Democrat on the court for that decision (see news story on the case) and he was one of the 4 judges who sided with Brunner in the 4-3 decision. 

Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner has removed the case to U.S. District Court in Columbus, on the grounds that the complaint against Brunner arises under federal law, namely the Help American Vote Act.  Additionally, the Ohio Supreme Court shortened the timeframe for the case, saying it wants Brunner's response to the case today and all briefs and evidence from both parties by 10 a.m. Wednesday, rather than Friday.

Commentary

Edward B. Foley

Of Bouncing Balls and a Big Blue Shift

Edward B. Foley

It is a fortuitous coincidence that the University of Virginia’s Journal of Law & Politics has just published a piece of mine that shows the relevance of the current vote-counting process in Virginia’s Attorney General election to what might happen if the 2016 presidential election turns on a similar vote-counting process in Virginia. 

Read full post here.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Voter ID Law

In two opinions issued today, the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the state's voter ID law against challenges that the law violated the Wisconsin Constitution. The court issued an opinion in League of Women Voters of Wisconsin v. Walker and also an opinion in Milwaukee Branch of the NAACP v. Walker.

more info & analysis...