Posted: November 9, 2012
NEOCH Plaintiffs' File Reply in Ohio Provisional Ballot Case
The plaintiffs in the Ohio provisional ballot case of NEOCH v. Husted filed their reply yesterday to the State's memorandum. The plaintiffs argued that an April 2010 consent decree protects voters from disenfranchisement if poll workers do not record voter information on provisional ballot forms. Attached to the reply is a copy of the transcript from Wednesday's hearing before Judge Marbley.