Posted: November 9, 2012
NEOCH Plaintiffs' File Reply in Ohio Provisional Ballot Case
The plaintiffs in the Ohio provisional ballot case of NEOCH v. Husted filed their reply yesterday to the State's memorandum. The plaintiffs argued that an April 2010 consent decree protects voters from disenfranchisement if poll workers do not record voter information on provisional ballot forms. Attached to the reply is a copy of the transcript from Wednesday's hearing before Judge Marbley.


Commentary
Silence of the Lambs
Dale A. Oesterle
With the election of 2012 now well over and past the second inauguration of the incumbent President, the historical analysis of the events has begun and will last as long as written human history lasts. An interesting tidbit may already be lost to the majesty of the moment.
The voters of three very different states, Alaska, New Hampshire, and Ohio, all had an opportunity to call state constitutional conventions. In each state the voters turned the opportunity down by very similar votes, 68%, 64% and 68% respectively against.
more commentary...