Posted: November 5, 2012
Two lawsuits challenging Ohio voting machines
Two lawsuits challenging Ohio voting machines were filed today. Fitrakis v. Husted et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Columbus. The lawsuit alleges that the software and hardware on Ohio voting machine equipment provided by Election Systems & Software, Inc. could allow vote manipulation by non-election board officials. Among other things, the lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order prohibiting the use of hardware or software provided by Election Systems & Software, Inc. on Election Day. Judge Gregory Frost will conduct an oral hearing on the motion for a temporary restraining order at 9:00 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012.
In addition, Fitrakis v. Husted et al. was filed in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in Columbus, Ohio. The Franklin County lawsuit alleges the same claims as the federal lawsuit and seeks identical relief.


Commentary
Silence of the Lambs
Dale A. Oesterle
With the election of 2012 now well over and past the second inauguration of the incumbent President, the historical analysis of the events has begun and will last as long as written human history lasts. An interesting tidbit may already be lost to the majesty of the moment.
The voters of three very different states, Alaska, New Hampshire, and Ohio, all had an opportunity to call state constitutional conventions. In each state the voters turned the opportunity down by very similar votes, 68%, 64% and 68% respectively against.
more commentary...