OSU Navigation Bar

Election Law @ Moritz Home Page

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law @ Moritz

Information & Analysis

Two lawsuits challenging Ohio voting machines

Two lawsuits challenging Ohio voting machines were filed today. Fitrakis v. Husted et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Columbus. The lawsuit alleges that the software and hardware on Ohio voting machine equipment provided by Election Systems & Software, Inc. could allow vote manipulation by non-election board officials. Among other things, the lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order prohibiting the use of hardware or software provided by Election Systems & Software, Inc. on Election Day. Judge Gregory Frost will conduct an oral hearing on the motion for a temporary restraining order at 9:00 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012.

In addition, Fitrakis v. Husted et al. was filed in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in Columbus, Ohio. The Franklin County lawsuit alleges the same claims as the federal lawsuit and seeks identical relief.


Edward B. Foley

Of Bouncing Balls and a Big Blue Shift

Edward B. Foley

It is a fortuitous coincidence that the University of Virginia’s Journal of Law & Politics has just published a piece of mine that shows the relevance of the current vote-counting process in Virginia’s Attorney General election to what might happen if the 2016 presidential election turns on a similar vote-counting process in Virginia. 

Read full post here.

more commentary...

In the News

Daniel P. Tokaji

Ohio treasurer receives OK to host town halls

Professor Daniel Tokaji was quoted in an article from the Associated Press about an attorney general opinion that allows the Ohio treasurer to conduct telephone town halls using public money. The opinion will likely have broad ramifications for the upcoming elections, Tokaji said.

“As a practical matter, while that legal advice is certainly right, very serious concerns can arise about whether these are really intended to inform Ohio constituents about the operations of his office or if they’re campaign events,” he said.

more EL@M in the news...

Info & Analysis

Judge Denies Motion for Preliminary Injunction in NC Case

U.S. District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder denied the motion for a preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs in a case challenging a new North Carolina voting law as violating the Voting Rights Act and the federal Constitution. Judge Schroeder also denied the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is North Carolina NAACP v. McCrory.

more info & analysis...