- Campaign Finance: Balancing Political Inequality with Free Speech, with Rick Hasen
- Election Day Brings Victories for Many Moritz Alumni
- Foley writes op-ed in New York Times for Election Day
- Tokaji releases new election spending book
- Chairs of presidential commission to talk about election recommendations
Week of March 30, 2014
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of March 30, 2014.
- National - Supreme Court lifts ban on aggregate campaign donations (USA Today)
- Arizona - Arizona Supreme Court says voter-approved law on campaign contributions set formula, not limit (Green Field Reporter)
- North Carolina - NC election officials identify hundreds of cases of potential voter fraud (Charlotte Observer)
- National - Watchdog group wins FOIA victory in search for Tom Delay files (Star-Telegram)
- Nevada - U.S. Supreme Court ruling at center of Whittemore appeal (Reno Gazette-Journal)
- North Carolina - Groups fighting voter ID law say state holding documents (News & Record)
Information & Analysis
Information and analysis on the latest developments in election law during the week of March 30, 2014.
- U.S. Supreme Court strikes down aggregate campaign contribution cap
- 11th Circuit: Florida's voter purge violated NVRA
Below is a list of important litigation documents that were added to our site during the week of March 30, 2014. For a complete list of documents for a particular case, please visit the respective case page. You can view all cases EL@M is following by visiting the Major Pending Cases.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.