- Campaign Finance: Balancing Political Inequality with Free Speech, with Rick Hasen
- Election Day Brings Victories for Many Moritz Alumni
- Foley writes op-ed in New York Times for Election Day
- Tokaji releases new election spending book
- Chairs of presidential commission to talk about election recommendations
Week of March 16, 2014
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of March 16, 2014.
- Ohio - Libertarians appeal to get on Ohio primary ballot (Columbus Dispatch)
- Kansas, Arizona - Judge says U.S. must help states enforce Voter ID laws (New York Times)
- National - Group asks U.N. to ensure Americans' voting rights (Des Moines Register)
- Iowa - Voting Rights of an estimated 50,000 at stake in Friday decision (Radio Iowa)
- Florida - Orange's Hispanic voting-rights fight moves to court (Orlando Sentinel)
- California - Judge won't halt Whittier city election in voting rights dispute (Southern California Public Radio)
- Texas - Texans Take to Voter ID (Houston News)
Information & Analysis
Information and analysis on the latest developments in election law during the week of March 16, 2014.
- Ohio Federal Judge Rules against Libertarian Gubernatorial Candidate
- Federal Judge Rules in Favor of Kansas and Arizona in Suit Against EAC
Below is a list of important litigation documents that were added to our site during the week of March 16, 2014. For a complete list of documents for a particular case, please visit the respective case page. You can view all cases EL@M is following by visiting the Major Pending Cases.
- Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Husted (Case Page)
District Court order denying motion for preliminary injunction
- Kobach v. EAC (Case Page)
District Court order in favor of Kansas and Arizona
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.