- Campaign Finance: Balancing Political Inequality with Free Speech, with Rick Hasen
- Election Day Brings Victories for Many Moritz Alumni
- Foley writes op-ed in New York Times for Election Day
- Tokaji releases new election spending book
- Chairs of presidential commission to talk about election recommendations
Week of May 26, 2013
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of May 26, 2013.
- Texas - Supreme Court orders lower courts to reconsider rulings blocking Texas voter ID, redistricting (Washington Post)
- New York - New York City Wants to Revive Old Voting Machines (The New York Times)
- Wisconsin - Wisconsin appeals court rules state voter photo ID law constitutional (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)
- Nevada - Nev. developer guilty of illegal campaign contributions (USA Today)
- Florida - Critics fret over doubling of campaign-cash cap (Orlando Sentinel )
- Illinois - Effort to pull controversial election authority from local officials stalled (Chicago Tribune)
- Nevada - Reid says he’s ‘sorry’ Whittemore is facing trial on campaign finance violations (Las Vegas Sun)
- National - As IRS scandal flares, a watchdog calls attention to other tax-exempt groups (The Miami Herald)
- Ohio - Poll worker convicted of voting fraud (Cincinnati.com)
- Pennsylvania - Voter ID challenge to proceed in court (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette )
- Ohio - Ohio moves to comply with 20-year-old federal law on voter information (Cleveland Plain Dealer)
- National, Ohio - Groups Targeted by I.R.S. Tested Rules on Politics (The New York Times)
Information & Analysis
Information and analysis on the latest developments in election law during the week of May 26, 2013.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.