- Campaign Finance: Balancing Political Inequality with Free Speech, with Rick Hasen
- Election Day Brings Victories for Many Moritz Alumni
- Foley writes op-ed in New York Times for Election Day
- Tokaji releases new election spending book
- Chairs of presidential commission to talk about election recommendations
Week of February 24, 2013
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of February 24, 2013.
- Colorado - Federal judge dismisses challenge to Colorado campaign-finance law (Denver Post)
- Iowa - Iowa House panel OKs requiring voter ID at polling sites (Omaha World-Herald)
- Pennsylvania - Dems chide administration for lack of voter ed (Philadelphia Inquirer)
- National - Voting Rights Act under fire at Supreme Court (Politico)
- Wisconsin - Federal panel opens GOP computers in Wisconsin redistricting case (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)
- North Carolina - Judges hear case for keeping NC redistricting map (Raleigh News & Observer)
- Pennsylvania - Attorney general weighs defending voter ID (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)
- Montana - House passes campaign finance bill (Helena Independent Record)
- National - Supreme Court Will Not Hear Campaign Finance Case On Corporate Donations (NPR)
- Texas - Mesquite legislator's bill targets absentee balloting by limiting trips to the mailbox (Dallas Morning News)
- Arizona - Arizona GOP wants new campaign contribution limits (San Francisco Chronicle )
- Florida - House D’s get extra hours for early voting (sort of) (Orlando Sentinel)
- Florida - Miami-Dade has authority to enact absentee ballot law, judge rules (Miami Herald)
Information & Analysis
Information and analysis on the latest developments in election law during the week of February 24, 2013.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.