- Campaign Finance: Balancing Political Inequality with Free Speech, with Rick Hasen
- Election Day Brings Victories for Many Moritz Alumni
- Foley writes op-ed in New York Times for Election Day
- Tokaji releases new election spending book
- Chairs of presidential commission to talk about election recommendations
Week of October 14, 2012
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of October 14, 2012.
- Wisconsin, Ohio - Swing-State Billboards Warning Against Voter Fraud Stir Backlash (NPR)
- Tennessee - Appeals judge to hear Voter ID challenge today (The Tennessean)
- National - The state of the U.S. election system (MIT News)
- North Dakota - Former ND GOP chairman challenges law banning campaigning on Election Day (Grand Forks Herald)
- Ohio - Suit aims to protect Ohio arrestees' voting rights (San Francisco Chronicle)
- Wisconsin - Romney campaign files lawsuit, seeking more time for military, overseas ballots (Wisconsin State Journal)
- Montana - Mont contribution limits in place through election (Helena Independent Record)
- Kansas - Counties blamed for school ID voting confusion (The Topeka Capital-Journal)
- Arizona - Supreme Court will consider reinstating Arizona voter registration law (Washington Post)
- Ohio - Supreme Court won't block early voting in Ohio (Politico)
Commentary on the latest developments in election law during the week of October 14, 2012.
Information & Analysis
Information and analysis on the latest developments in election law during the week of October 14, 2012.
- Readings Relevant to Recounts & Other “Extra Innings” Issues
- New Cases Now Tracked by EL@M
- U.S. Supreme Court Denies Stay in Ohio Early Voting Case
- U.S. Supreme Court Accepts Arizona Voter Registration Case for Review
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.