Week of August 19, 2012
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of August 19, 2012.
- Florida - Facing FBI scrutiny, former Democratic candidate files amended campaign finance (The Miami Herald)
- Pennsylvania - Pennsylvania Supreme Court moves voter-ID appeal up on its schedule (Philadelphia Inquirer)
- National - Obama campaign first to accept donation-by-text message (Los Angeles Times)
- Florida - Showdown Looming Between Rick Scott and Monroe Elections Supervisor? (Sunshine State News)
- Pennsylvania - Pa. wants later date for voter-ID appeal (Philadelphia Inquirer)
- Alaska - Alaska Sues Over Provisions of Voting Rights Act (ABC News)
- Wisconsin - Van Hollen again asks Supreme Court to take up photo ID law (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)
- Virginia - Justice Department upholds Va. voter ID law, governor says (Washington Post)
- Pennsylvania - State answers federal request for information on Voter ID law (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)
- Florida - As always, Florida in the middle of the voting wars (Washington Post)
Information & Analysis
Information and analysis on the latest developments in election law during the week of August 19, 2012.
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Grants Motion to Expedite Applewhite Case
- Wisconsin AG Asks State Supreme Court to Review Voter ID Rulings
Below is a list of important litigation documents that were added to our site during the week of August 19, 2012. For a complete list of documents for a particular case, please visit the respective case page. You can view all cases EL@M is following by visiting the Major Pending Cases.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.