Week of August 12, 2012
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of August 12, 2012.
- Florida - U.S. court says Florida's early voting rules discriminatory (Reuters)
- Ohio - All counties will have same hours for voting (Cincinnati Enquirer)
- Pennsylvania - Some election workers express defiance over ruling (Philadelphia Inquirer)
- Ohio - Jon Husted doesn't rule out limiting early voting throughout Ohio (Cleveland Plain Dealer)
- Pennsylvania - Pennsylvania voter ID law should go forward, court rules (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)
- Kansas - Some county ballots not counted for lack of photo ID (The Topeka Capital-Journal)
- Georgia - Election board evaluating provisional ballots policy (Savannah Morning News)
- California - Judge orders changes to Prop. 32 language (Los Angeles Times)
- Minnesota - Top state court rules campaign finance laws apply to schools (Minneapolis Star Tribune)
- Mississippi - Voter ID unlikely for Nov. election (Hattiesburg American)
Commentary on the latest developments in election law during the week of August 12, 2012.
- Foley - Will the Voting Rules Affect Which Candidate Wins?
- Foley - Analyzing a “Voting Wars” Trifecta
Information & Analysis
Information and analysis on the latest developments in election law during the week of August 12, 2012.
- Court Refuses to Preclear FL Early Voting Plan
- Summary of PI Hearing in Obama for America v. Husted
- Judge Does Not Block Pennsylvania Voter ID Law
Below is a list of important litigation documents that were added to our site during the week of August 12, 2012. For a complete list of documents for a particular case, please visit the respective case page. You can view all cases EL@M is following by visiting the Major Pending Cases.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.