- Campaign Finance: Balancing Political Inequality with Free Speech, with Rick Hasen
- Election Day Brings Victories for Many Moritz Alumni
- Foley writes op-ed in New York Times for Election Day
- Tokaji releases new election spending book
- Chairs of presidential commission to talk about election recommendations
Week of July 29, 2012
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of July 29, 2012.
- National - Dingell bill aims to reinstate limits on corporate PAC donations (The Detroit News)
- Nebraska - Supreme Court overturns campaign finance law (Lincoln Journal Star)
- National - New Target In Voter ID Battle: 1965 Voting Rights Act (NPR)
- West Virginia - Elections panel votes to defend public campaign financing (The Charleston Gazette)
- Pennsylvania - Pennsylvania Expected Fewer to Lack ID, Official Says (Businessweek)
- Florida - Feds: Florida’s voter purge violates federal law (The Miami Herald)
- Pennsylvania - Pennsylvania voter ID law hearing stretches into 5th day (The Patriot News (Harrisburg))
- Pennsylvania - Former clerks testify at Orie Melvin preliminary hearing (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)
- Tennessee - City Voter ID Suit Alleges Voter Turned Away Twice (The Memphis Daily News)
- Ohio - Overhaul of poll laws still stalled (Cincinnati Enquirer)
- Ohio - Will Ohio count your vote? (Cincinnati Enquirer)
- Florida - Brown, Duval County Democrats, sue over early voting days reduction (The Palm Beach Post)
Information & Analysis
Information and analysis on the latest developments in election law during the week of July 29, 2012.
Below is a list of important litigation documents that were added to our site during the week of July 29, 2012. For a complete list of documents for a particular case, please visit the respective case page. You can view all cases EL@M is following by visiting the Major Pending Cases.
- Voting for America v. Skeen (Case Page)
Judge Grants Injunction for Part of Texas Voter Registration Law
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.