- Campaign Finance: Balancing Political Inequality with Free Speech, with Rick Hasen
- Election Day Brings Victories for Many Moritz Alumni
- Foley writes op-ed in New York Times for Election Day
- Tokaji releases new election spending book
- Chairs of presidential commission to talk about election recommendations
Week of July 15, 2012
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of July 15, 2012.
- Michigan - State Dems file formal complaint against speaker (Midland Daily News)
- National, Pennsylvania - Legal Battles Erupt Over Tough Voter ID Laws (The New York Times)
- West Virginia - Supreme Court candidate considering legal options after public funding halted (The Charleston Gazette)
- Texas - Texas wants access to federal database of immigrants to check voter rolls (The Dallas Morning News)
- Pennsylvania - Report turns up Philadelphia voting irregularities (Philadelphia Inquirer)
- Minnesota - Photo ID details draw scrutiny of Minnesota's high court (Minneapolis Star Tribune)
- Wisconsin - Second judge rejects state voter ID law (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)
- Ohio - Obama campaign sues Husted over early voting issue (Toledo Blade)
- Colorado - Marks prevails (again) in Aspen ballot case (Aspen Times)
- Colorado - Homeland Security says Gessler may check voter citizenship (The Denver Post)
- Pennsylvania - Debate rages over voter ID law as court challenge looms (York Daily Record)
- National - Tax-Exempt Group’s Election Activity Highlights Limits of Campaign Finance Rules (The New York Times)
- National - Measuring the Effects of Voter Identification Laws (The New York Times)
Information & Analysis
Information and analysis on the latest developments in election law during the week of July 15, 2012.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.