Week of July 8, 2012
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of July 8, 2012.
- National - Senate to Vote on DISCLOSE Act Monday, McConnell Pledges Filibuster (U.S. News & World Report)
- Tennessee - Library Cards at Root of Voter ID Challenge (The Daily News (Memphis))
- Texas - Testimony wraps up in Texas Voter ID law trial (Fort Worth Star-Telegram)
- National - Voting rights, voting wrongs (The Economist)
- Washington, D.C. - Report: Gray Campaign Hid Worker Pay (NBC4 Washington)
- Wisconsin - Republicans call Racine recall election 'utter mockery' in letter to GAB (Racine Journal Times)
- Colorado - Legal fees but one battle in Aspen ballot case (The Aspen Times)
- Arizona - Gov. Brewer nixes plan for election law special session (Maricopa Monitor)
- Michigan - U.S. Rep. Thaddeus McCotter resignation may mean two elections for his seat in November (Dearborn Press & Guide)
- New York - Cuomo to push for public financing of state campaigns (New York Post )
- Ohio - Ohio Election ballot process won't change (Bucyrus Telegraph Forum)
- Alabama - US Supreme Court expected to hear Shelby County's challenge to the Voting Rights Act (The Birmingham News)
- Ohio - Appeal dropped in juvenile judge race (Cincinnati Enquirer)
- National - Democrats to Ask for Curbs on Donor-Shielding Groups (The New York Times)
- Illinois - Quinn signs campaign finance law loophole (Chicago Tribune)
- Texas - Texas Voter ID faces its biggest trial (Fort Worth Star-Telegram)
Below is a list of important litigation documents that were added to our site during the week of July 8, 2012. For a complete list of documents for a particular case, please visit the respective case page. You can view all cases EL@M is following by visiting the Major Pending Cases.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.