- Campaign Finance: Balancing Political Inequality with Free Speech, with Rick Hasen
- Election Day Brings Victories for Many Moritz Alumni
- Foley writes op-ed in New York Times for Election Day
- Tokaji releases new election spending book
- Chairs of presidential commission to talk about election recommendations
Week of June 3, 2012
The latest election law headlines taken from media outlets across the country during the week of June 3, 2012.
- Delaware - Del. lawmakers approve campaign finance revisions (Business Week)
- Nevada - Whittemore pleads not guilty in illegal campaign contributions case (Las Vegas Review-Journal)
- Colorado - Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper signs into law rules for public review of voted ballots (The Denver Post)
- Florida - County elections chiefs to state: We won’t resume voter purge (The Miami Herald)
- Minnesota - Minn. Supreme Court drawn into newest chapter of 'voting wars’ (Minneapolis Star Tribune)
- Rhode Island - RI bill would increase campaign finance disclosure (Real Clear Politics)
- Wisconsin - State's recall process also a loser in Tuesday's election (Wisconsin State Journal)
- Florida - Florida aiming to keep Nelson out of elections law battle (Orlando Sentinel)
- North Carolina - N.C. House seeks to soften voter ID bill (Winston-Salem Journal)
- California - AP says Proposition 28, on term limits, passing (Los Angeles Times)
- Nevada - Group accused of violating election laws (Las Vegas Review-Journal)
- New Hampshire - Voter ID plan would take effect in fall, with tigheter restrictions later (Nashua Telegraph)
- Connecticut - Conn. House speaker: No one bought my influence (Real Clear Politics)
- Montana - Ken Miller violated campaign finance laws, political practices commissioner finds (Helena Independent Record)
Commentary on the latest developments in election law during the week of June 3, 2012.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.