U.S. District Judge Gershwin Drain issued an opinion blocking enforcement of a Michigan law prohibiting straight-ticket voting. This voting method allows voters to easily select the entire slate of candidates on the ballot from a particular party. Michigan abolished straight-ticket voting by enacting a law effective in January. In granting the plaintffs\' motion for a preliminary injunction, Judge Drain determined that the law \"presents a disproportionate burden on African-Americans\' right to vote.\" The case is Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Johnson.
The Fifth Circuit, sitting en banc, issued an opinion finding that Texas\' voter ID law violates section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The court remanded the case to the district court to determine a remedy. The case is Veasey v. Abbott.
In a case on remand from the Seventh Circuit, U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman issued a decision granting plaintiffs\' motion for a preliminary injunction, easing voter ID requirements imposed by Wisconsin law. Under Judge Adelman\'s order, voters who have difficulty obtaining a requisite ID after reasonable effort can vote once they submit an affidavit swearing they are eligible voters and specifying a reason for their inability to obtain photo ID. The case is Frank v. Walker.
In an opinion released Monday, U.S. District Judge Robert Payne struck down a Virginia law that restricts the voting activity of Virginia delegates at national political party conventions. The plaintiff, Virginia delegate Beau Correll, plans to vote for a candidate other than presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, and argued that the Virginia law would impose criminal penalties on him if he did so. The case is Correll v. Herring.
D.C.-based U.S. District Judge Richard Leon recently issued an opinion denying an attempt to block Arizona, Georgia, and Kansas from requiring proof of citizenship from voters using the National Mail Voter Registration Form. Judge Leon denied the plaintiffs\' motion for a preliminary injunction, but will consider the merits of the parties\' arguments in full at a later stage of the litigation. The case is League of Women Voters v. Newby.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.