- Alumna thrives as elections counsel in office of Ohio Secretary of State
- Professor Edward B. Foley earns fellowship
- Campaign Finance: Balancing Political Inequality with Free Speech, with Rick Hasen
- Election Day Brings Victories for Many Moritz Alumni
- Foley writes op-ed in New York Times for Election Day
Today, U.S. District Judge Michael Watson issued Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in an Ohio early voting case, determining that Ohio\'s reduction of in-person early voting days violated Equal Protection and the Voting Rights Act. Judge Watson dismissed additional claims brought by the plaintiffs. A bench trial was held in late 2015. The case is Ohio Organizing Collaborative v. Husted.
Today, U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson issued an opinion upholding Virginia\'s voter ID after a bench trial held in February. Judge Hudson determined that neither the enactment of the law nor its implementation violated the Voting Rights Act, the First Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fifteenth Amendment, or the Twenty-Sixth Amendment. The case is Lee v. Virginia State Board of Elections.
In a 485-page opinion released yesterday, U.S. District Judge Thomas Schroeder upheld North Carolina\'s voter ID law. A trial on the photo ID issue was held in January and February. The case is League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. Howard.
In an unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court today denied a challenge to Arizona\'s redistricting process done by commission. The case is Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission.
In an opinion authored by Judge Frank Easterbrook, yesterday the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed a District Court decision that rejected plaintiffs\' additional challenges to Wisconsin\'s voter ID law. The 7th Circuit ruled that the District Court should further consider plaintiffs\' arguments that certain persons are entitled to relief who face substantial obstacles to obtaining an acceptable form of identification. The case is Frank v. Walker.
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.