Tweets from https://twitter.com/OSU_Law/lists/election-law-at-moritz
- Motion for Preliminary Injunction Denied on Voter ID Issue in NC Case - January 19, 2016, 9:15 am
- Federal Judge Dismisses Some of Claims in Virginia Voting Rights Case - December 18, 2015, 4:45 pm
- Federal Judge Dismisses Some of Claims in Wisconsin Voting Rights Case - December 18, 2015, 4:30 pm
- U.S. Supreme Court Issues Opinion on 3-Judge Panels in Redistricting Cases - December 9, 2015, 9:09 am
- Federal Judge Dismisses Remaining Claims in Wisconsin Voter ID Case - October 20, 2015, 9:30 am
- Fifth Circuit Affirms that Texas Voter ID Law Violates Voting Rights Act - August 5, 2015, 2:48 pm
- Stebenne - Ohio's presidential drought, what caused it and what can end it - February 11, 2016
- Stebenne - Clinton, Sanders and the changing face of the Democratic Party - February 9, 2016
- Tokaji - What would it take to find out for sure if Ted Cruz (or others like him) is eligible for the presidency? - February 3, 2016
- Foley - Trump Disputes Iowa Results, a Change of Tone After Second-Place Finish - February 3, 2016
- Foley - Arguments Over North Carolina Voter ID Law Begin in Federal Court - January 25, 2016
- North Carolina - League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. HowardIssue: 1. Does the reduction in early voting days, loss of same-day registration, and elimination of out of precinct provisional voting opportunities…
- Louisiana - Scott v. SchedlerIssue: Whether Louisiana has complied with the obligations imposed on states by the federal government in the NVRA.
- Alabama - Alabama Democratic Conference v. Alabama Issue: Whether Alabama’s effort to redraw the lines of each majority-black district to have the same black population as it would have using…
- Washington, D.C.
New state voting laws face first presidential election test - January 29, 2016, 9:00 pm
- North Carolina
North Carolina's voter ID law goes on trial - January 25, 2016, 1:30 pm
Lake County Seeks to Create Equity in Election Law for Military Voters - January 7, 2016, 1:00 pm
The Supreme Court may change ‘one person, one vote.’ This would hurt Latinos and Democrats - December 9, 2015, 1:00 pm
Election Law at Moritz is nonpartisan and does not endorse, support, or oppose any candidate, campaign, or party. Opinions expressed by individuals associated with Election Law at Moritz, either on this web site or in connection with conferences or other activities undertaken by the program, represent solely the views of the individuals offering the opinions and not the program itself. Election Law at Moritz institutionally does not represent any clients or participate in any litigation. Individuals affiliated with the program may in their own personal capacity participate in campaign or election activity, or engage in pro bono representation of clients other than partisan candidates or organizations.